Nature & Environment Policy Plan
Netherlands Antilles, 2004-2007

Willemstad, January 2004

Introduction

ACTIONS

A healthy environment and a rich diversity of nature are requirements for the existence and well-being of humankind, and for economic development. Considering the far reaching impacts that humans have on nature and the environment, they have the responsibility to protect and wisely manage them.

In art. 2, paragraph e.10, of the Islands Regulation Netherlands Antilles (ERNA, 1998), the environmental tasks of the central government are specified as follows: “environmental and nature management and conservation as they derive from treaties”

Based on this, and the resulting legislation (the yet to be passed National Environment Ordinance1, and the National Nature Conservation Ordinance2 passed in 1998) the central government is legally obliged to set out a policy with regard to management and conservation of nature and the environment.

In various official statements of the Government of the Netherlands Antilles the pursuit of sustainable development has been expressed. Experience teaches however, that the practical implementation of this ambition is ever so difficult. To be sure, the catchword ‘sustainability’ has become common property, but as yet lacks broad support in practice. Taking care of nature and the environment generally yields rewards only in the long term, while short term needs usually receive more attention. Because nature and environment usually lose out when short term exigencies get priority, it is consequently the environmental sector which tries to concretize the pursuit of sustainability.

 

 

Background

Playa Guepi, CuraçaoDuring 1995, 1996 the Department (then Section) of Environment and Nature Conservation, or MINA, in consultation with the island governments and relevant civil groups, drafted a policy document outlining national policy on environment and nature conservation3, the first such document of the Netherlands Antilles in this field. In September 1996 this white paper “Contours of Environmental and Nature Conservation Policy of the Netherlands Antilles, 1996-2000” was endorsed by the Council of Ministers of the Netherlands Antilles. The ‘Contours Paper’ sketches the desired direction of nature conservation and environmental policy over the indicated period, identifying a number of priority attention themes.

The criteria used to determine the priority environmental issues or themes that the national policy needs to address, are:

  • The degree of endangerment to a sustainable future,
  • the level of threat to the environment,
  • the relation to the economy, and
  • the commonality (i.e. experienced by all five islands of the Netherlands Antilles) of the environmental issues

five themes were thus identified in consultation with the islands, in this first environmental policy document. In 2001 a sixth theme was added. They are (in no particular order):

  • waste and waste water,
  • oil and the environment,
  • tourism in relation to the environment,
  • nature conservation,
  • increasing public support for environmental care and nature conservation,
  • Sustainable energy

The selection of these priority themes was based on surveys, recommendations, and advice on environment and nature in the Netherlands Antilles, published over the preceding years. In addition, the ‘Contours Paper’ notes the prerequisites for environmental policy implementation, i.e.

  • legislation, standards, and inspection,
  • cooperation, and
  • funding of environmental policy.

Following is a very brief explanation for the main priority themes.

The lack of a policy to prevent, reduce and recycle waste in the past has led to a steady growth of the waste volume, whereas our small islands have very little space for waste disposal. This growing problem must be addressed. The commonality of the waste water problem, posing a threat to environment, biodiversity, public health, and economic development potential also demands decisive action.

The importance of the oil industry to the economy and as employer in the Netherlands Antilles (refinery and oil transshipment terminal in Curaçao, oil transshipment terminals in Bonaire and in St. Eustatius), with its flipside of serious environmental effects of the production and disastrous effects of inadequate transfer and transport of oil products, also warrants careful attention.

Similarly, tourism is of great economic importance to all the islands, but can have serious environmental impacts. In order for it to be sustainable its effects on environment, society, and planning must be carefully managed or prevented. Tourists choose the islands of the Netherlands Antilles as a destination because of their natural attractions, for one thing. It is essential to preserve that attraction while minimizing its environmental and societal impacts.

Protection and conservation of nature, the fourth priority theme, is not only important because of the enormous economic value of biodiversity, both direct and indirect, but also because of its intrinsic value. In addition it is a very limited resource on our small islands, so it needs to be preserved.

The fifth theme, increasing the support for environmental care and nature conservation is clearly a basic requirement if the policy is to be successfully implemented. If there is no awareness of the need for environmental care and nature conservation, one cannot expect anyone to make any effort towards it.

Considering the significance of sustainable energy to sustainable development, the rapid developments in the field and the wish of several islands to provide for their energy needs in a more sustainable way, the subject of sustainable energy was added as sixth main priority theme in 2000 when the second multi-year environmental policy plan was written.

The selection of these priority themes means that other environmental themes— important as well—will receive less or no attention. Things like transport and traffic, noise pollution, or air pollution. Because of the limited capacity of the central and island governments however, prioritization is unavoidable. At the same time the islands are counted on—within the limits of their capacity—to address some of the additional environmental problems in their island policies if possible. Sometimes a little effort can carry far, e.g. in the area of traffic and air pollution by improved checks of the exhaust gases during the obligatory vehicle inspections. In such cases the central government will assist by providing standards. Based on the Contours Paper several other policy documents were prepared during the term of the Contours Paper, setting out specific policy in several of the priority themes, i.e. “Framework for Waste Management Policy of the Netherlands Antilles“4 , “White Paper on Sustainable Tourism”5, and “Nature Policy of the Netherlands Antilles”6

In 1999 a progress report on environmental and nature conservation policy was prepared7 This report looks at what has been achieved, or was not achieved in the area of environment and nature conservation over the preceding period, and which obstacles will have to be surmounted if the objective of better environmental care and nature conservation is to be achieved.

In 2001 a new Multi-year plan for environmental and nature conservation policy8 was produced based on the previous Contours Paper and its 1999 evaluation. It provides the framework for environmental and nature conservation policy for the period 2001-2005, and added sustainable energy as a sixth priority theme. Like the preceding Contours Paper, a major part of the financing for its implementation again came from the cooperative means of the Dutch Government through the Ministry of Government Reform and Kingdom Relations (BVK), based on the recognition that environmental and nature conservation policy are essential to sustainable development. Because of delays in the realization of the financing, implementation of the new Multi-year Plan did not really start until the last quarter of 2003.

In reassessing the Multi-year Plan at that time, which should have been its halfway mark, it became apparent that notwithstanding the lack of funding, nevertheless some important results were achieved in the period 2000-2003, i.e. after the 1999 progress report. Partly these resulted from activities set into motion as part of the first “Contours Paper”, partly they were realized with the very limited means available and with the help of alternative or third party external funding.

Thus the overview of the waste problem in the Netherlands Antilles was greatly improved, with inventories made of the waste situation in Saba and St. Eustatius and corresponding action plans formulated. An implementation plan for the recycling and adequate disposal of car wrecks was drafted with support from the Dutch ministry of environment (VROM). An inventory of hazardous waste was completed in Curaçao. The bilateral agreement for international transport of hazardous waste (under the Basel Convention) between the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles has been renewed. In 2002 the 4th Waste Management Conference took place in Curaçao. At that conference, updates were presented on the actual waste management situation on all the islands including Aruba, and the recycling of car wrecks was discussed. As to legislation, a model island ordinance for waste management was drafted, providing a template for the island authorities to regulate the collection and the disposal of solid waste. Similarly a model waste water management ordinance was produced.

On the nature conservation front much was achieved as well. Two additional Nature Forum meetings took place after 1999. One in Curaçao in 2000, the third such meeting since 1996, which resulted in a document clearly elaborating the amount of sustainable funding needed for the survival and basic infrastructure of the nature conservation management organizations of the Netherlands Antilles9. The meeting also established a Netherlands Antilles Nature Conservation Initiative (NANCI) with a broad communication network. The fourth Nature Forum meeting took place in St. Maarten in 2002, and established the importance of monitoring for nature conservation. It also reaffirmed the urgent need for the establishment of a trust fund for nature conservation in the Netherlands Antilles, and a working group further elaborated terms of reference for a trust fund study. Together with the ‘Financing Plan’ produced by the Nature Forum 2000, this provided the basis for the long intended study on how to establish such a trust fund, and which finally started with Dutch cooperative funding in 2004. Meanwhile the nature conservation organizations in St. Eustatius and St. Maarten, both on the brink of closing down due to lack of sustainable income, were kept alive partly with Dutch cooperative funding and partly with financial support from the respective island.

The Netherlands Antilles Coral Reef Initiative (NACRI), established by the Nature Forum of 2000, as part of the NANCI, was strengthened through two conferences organized by MINA with funding from local NGO’s and private sector sponsors. As a direct result an extensive coordination and communication network for marine conservation efforts on the islands, including neighboring countries and international experts and organizations, was established. The NACRI further identifies and elaborates projects and activities focused on coral reef conservation.

A survey of the fishery of the Saba Bank was completed and prepared the way, not only for a similar survey in Curaçao, but also for a further indepth survey of the Saba Bank still to be realized, and also led to the production of a video on the fishery and biodiversity resources of the Bank that was broadcasted by the various island TV stations and also featured during the 6th Conference of Parties of the Convention on the protection of Biological Diversity (CBD) in the Netherlands in 2002.

Substantial progress was made on the subject of sustainable tourism. Both in Bonaire and Curaçao a number of hotels, tour and dive operators were joined in the “Naturally Antilles” project and environmental information was provided to tourists (as yet only in Dutch) through a brochure, certificates at participating operators, information pillars at participating hotels, and an extensive website www.natuurlijkantillen.info. At the same time the operators and hotels were trained in environmentally more responsible management.

In 2001, through its extensive and active communication network with environmental organizations on all islands, MINA was able on only one month’s notice, to direct more than NAƒ 600,000 of unspent Dutch cooperative funds to more than 25 environmental projects from a wide variety of NGO’s from all islands, supporting nature conservation management and environmental awareness. MINA subsequently monitored the implementation of those projects, which (with only one exception) were all completed successfully.

The above are just the main results of MINA’s efforts, in addition the National Environmental Ordinance was completed and now ready to be passed; the National Nature Conservation Ordinance was amended to better follow the various treaties; the Netherlands Antilles took a leading role in regional cooperation for the environment, in particular through the Cartagena Convention and its three protocols: hosting the Oil Spill protocol’s regional activity center REMPEITC in Curaçao, providing strong support for the SPAW protocol in working groups and as chair of both its Conference of Parties and its Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) in 2002 and 2003 and hosting the second STAC meeting in Curaçao in 2003. The Netherlands Antilles also became actively involved in the Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles (IAC), helping to prepare the consultative and the scientific committees, and rules of procedures under the protocol. Finally, MINA has built up a very good working relationship with the nature conservation organizations, the waste management organizations, and the environmental departments of the islands, involving them closely with central government policy, supporting and stimulating them, and providing funding for a large number of small projects through the years through the KNAP and MINA Funds.

All in all, reassessment of the 2001-2005 Multi-Year Plan as well as the preceding period, led to the conclusion that these past years have served to provide a solid foundation for sound environment and nature policy: inventories, assessments, analyses, policy documents, information materials, regulation and legislation, guidelines, etc. Though this may not be fully complete in al cases, it is nevertheless time for the next step, which is to improve the ways to measure the state of the environment and the progress made towards improving, preserving or restoring it. Further indicators, baseline values and targets must now be identified and formulated. Measuring means knowing, and measuring means making the problems tangible. It is the only road that leads to effective enforcement of regulations.

This conclusion led to the decision that instead of revising the existing Multi-Year Plan, a new Nature & Environment Policy Plan (NEP Plan) 2004-2007 would be made, incorporating clear output and effect indicators where possible, and acknowledging that a point has been reached where a “National Exploration of the State of the Environment”, is needed to provide clear indicators and baseline data, and better tools to target problem areas or obstacles.

As did the former multi-year plan, the NEP Plan provides the framework for environmental and nature conservation policy. In chapter 2 the premises and strategy are set out. In chapter 3 each of the priority environmental themes are discussed in more detail. Subsequently additional instruments, essential for effective environmental policy implementation, are discussed, starting with education and public awareness and involvement in chapter 4, followed by chapter 5 dealing with legislation, environmental standards, and enforcement. Chapter 6 lists the cooperative mechanisms with other departments, NGOs and other countries. Funding for the implementation of the policy is discussed in chapter 7. Chapter 8 discusses the implementation and the specific activities resulting from the NEP Plan. Chapter 9 finally, addresses monitoring and evaluation and a National Exploration of Nature and the Environment. An explanatory list of the many acronyms used in this document is provided as chapter 10

The NEP Plan 2004-2007 again serves as an umbrella for various thematic policy plans and reports such as the “Framework for Waste Management Policy”, Sustainable Tourism White Paper”, and “Nature Policy of the Netherlands Antilles”. Year Plans will detail specific activities to be implemented as part of the overall NEP Plan, and will provide progress reports of ongoing or completed activities.

 

 

Premises and Strategy

Starting point for Environment and Nature Conservation Policy is the sustainable development of the Netherlands Antilles, constrained by the special issues of Small Island Development States (SIDS).

Sustainable Development is defined as development tailored to meet the needs of the present without compromising the abilities of future generations to meet their needs. Small Island Developing States (SIDS)10 characteristically have specific geographical, social, and economic constraints that impede their aims to consistently achieve a policy of sustainable development. These constraints include a restricted and limited surface area, very little “buffer” area, activities on land often directly influence the surrounding sea, and vice versa, a limited range and reserves of natural resources, a strong dependence on imports especially, but also on exports, a very small economic home market, and a limited size of the agricultural sector.

Three aspects are crucial for sustainable development: the economic aspect, the ecological11 aspect, and the socio-cultural aspect. If one of these elements is neglected any development will not be sustainable. If the ecology—nature and the environment—deteriorates then the quality of our lives will be diminished; if socio-cultural values—traditions, morals, social controls—disappear, the quality of our lives will also be affected; and finally a decent existence for all will not be possible without economic growth.

The point then is the need to make choices, to seek a balance in order to realize sustainable development, while maintaining continuous vigilance to ensure that ecological, socio-cultural, and economic objectives are all served. Environmental policy must therefore be closely coordinated with other policy areas such as public health, spatial planning, industrial development, agriculture and fisheries, and must be clear and transparent.

In the present situation economic development and poverty alleviation have the highest priority for the Netherlands Antilles. Notwithstanding this urgency however, sustainability must not be lost from sight. Sustainable economic development, including poverty alleviation, is only possible with sound environment and nature policy. Without corals there will be less stay-over tourists (=less economic development); a polluted environment and disappearing nature will cause new forms of poverty as healthy air and wondrous nature will become available only for the rich.

The “asphalt lake” in Curaçao: An example of how rapid solutions to urgent problems, without taking other issues into consideration, can lead to huge problems in the future.
The asphalt lake was created during World War II, when the Allies had to increase fuel production at a highly accelerated pace. The byproducts were “temporarily” stored in an asphalt lake that, almost 60 years after the fact, is still very much present. This “heritage” in the middle of Willemstad, is not only an environmental disaster but also obstructs the growth and development of the harbor area

Environmental care and nature conservation are prime examples of long term issues; there are few other concerns that have comparably little direct benefit while being of comparable significance to the far future. Sustainable economic development then, means economic development subject to conservation and protection of the values of our society, and conservation and protection of our biodiversity and healthy environment. As especially the latter two concerns are not nearly as selfevident as the need to protect norms, values and traditions, they deserve a closer look.

Tourism is one of the most important pillars of the economy of all our islands. To achieve economic development tourism must be developed. If this is not subject however, to conservation of biodiversity and environmental care, the development will be selfdefeating. It will be clear that for a tourism destination it is of crucial importance that both nature and the environment are healthy and protected, because there will be no attraction for tourists otherwise. But what is important for tourism, i.e. for other people, is of course of equal importance to us. We too after all would rather live surrounded by beautiful and diverse nature, would rather breathe clean air and would rather not be poisoned by pollution of the soil or of the groundwater.

Against this background of striving to achieve sustainable development, the implementation of policies and priorities set out in this multi-year plan will continue steadfastly over the coming period. Legislation, in particular the development of standards and regulations and their enforcement will receive more attention over the coming period. For this it will be necessary to determine baselines, target values and effect indicators.

 

 

Over the past years much was done to get a better idea of the existing situation with respect to natural resources and environmental problems. Surveys and inventories were performed. Still, a detailed overall view of the state of our environment and the level of environmental awareness of the people is missing. To better measure the effects of our efforts we need to get a more precise and holistic picture of the present situation, to collate the available data and fill in the gaps. This will also enable us to target our efforts more efficiently at problem areas and provide a better base for long term planning. Over the coming period then, a scientifically sound and practicable study, to determine the national state of the environment will be conducted, based on clear terms of reference.

One of the most important instruments to achieve set objectives, especially considering the limited capacity and means available, is good cooperation among organizations and institutions that are active in the area of environment and nature conservation. Much attention will consequently be devoted to stimulating and facilitating such cooperation.

 

 

"National Exploration of the Environment": terms of reference and study

NOTES

  1. The National Environment Ordinance is ready and is in the process of being passed BACK TO TEXT
  2. The National Nature Conservation Ordinance was passed by the National Parliament in 1998 (PB 1998, 49), and came into force on February 1, 1999. On February 15, 2001 a number of amendments were passed by Parliament, in order to more closely follow the various treaties. BACK TO TEXT
  3. Contouren van het Milieu- en Natuurbeleid van de Nederalndse Antillen. Dept. of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Environmental Section, 1996. Willemstad. BACK TO TEXT
  4. Raamwerk van het afvalbeleid van de Nederlandse Antillen". Dept. of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Environmental Section. Willemstad, October 1997. BACK TO TEXT
  5. Nota Duurzaam Toerisme voor de Nederlandse Antillen. Environmental Section, Dept. of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene. Willemstad, August 1998. BACK TO TEXT
  6. The National Nature Policy Plan [“Natuurbeleid van de Nederlandse Antillen – aan de dageraad van een nieuw millennium”]. Environmental Section, Dept. of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene. Willemstad, February 2000] became official policy by Ministerial Decree of February 1, 2000, No. 538/JAZ. BACK TO TEXT
  7. Voortgangsrapportage van de Contourennota van het Milieu- en Natuurbeleid van de Nederlandse Antillen. Environmental Section, Dept. of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Willemstad, April 1999. BACK TO TEXT
  8. Meerjarenplan Milieu- en Natuurbeleid Nederlandse Antillen, 2001-2005. Dept. of Environment, Ministry of Public Health and Social Development. Willemstad, March 2001. BACK TO TEXT
  9. Begroting en Financieringsplan voor de beheerskosten van belangrijke natuur-gebieden van de Nederlandse Antillen. Publication resulting from the National Nature Forum 2000. Published by the Dept. of Environment, Ministry of Public Health and Social Development. Willemstad, December 2000. BACK TO TEXT
  10. UNCED, 1992. “Agenda 21”. Rio de Janerio. BACK TO TEXT
  11. Used here in a very broad sense, including biodiversity, natural resources and environment. BACK TO TEXT


 

 

Information © 2004 Dept. Environment & Nature Conservation (MINA); This site is hosted by NetTech N.V., Bonaire